Writ petition under writ jurisdiction was allowed to be withdrawn. Associated chamber summonses were disposed of accordingly.
Allowance of withdrawal of the writ petition and disposal of associated chamber summonses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp.534.2018_12.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J.
WRIT PETITION NO.534 OF 2018 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO.151 OF 2017 AND CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO.175 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.534 OF 2018
Patil Construction and Infrastructure Ltd. … Petitioner
Vs
The Union of India & Ors. … Respondents
Mr.S.B. Talekar with Ms.Madhavi Ayyapan i/b Talekar Associates for the Petitioner
Mr.T.J. Pandian for Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 5
CORAM: AKIL KURESHI &
S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATED: JULY 24, 2019
P.C.:
instructions, seeks to withdraw the above petition. Hence, the
petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
Chamber Summons (L) Nos.151 of 2017 and 175 of 2017 and the
same are disposed of accordingly.
(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Patil Construction and Infrastructure Ltd.
The Union of India
Akil Kureshi
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
