The High Court at Bombay disposed of a writ petition as infructuous following subsequent developments rendering the controversy devoid of live issues.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(958) wp-5325-13.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5325 OF 2013
Suvarna Purushottam Battase and Ors.} Petitioners
Vs
Union of India and Anr. } Respondents
Mr.Abhijit A. Joshi for the Petitioners.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & M. S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE :- FEBRUARY 27, 2019
P.C. :-
Mr.Abhijit Joshi fairly says that on account of subsequent developments, the controversy in this petition is rendered infructuous. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
M.M.Salgaonkar
Suvarna Purushottam Battase and Ors.
Union of India and Anr.
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
