In this matrimonial matter, the High Court set aside to dispose of a writ petition after confirming the existence of settlement terms and consent filed by the parties before the Family Court.
Rule made absolute and writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33-criwp-5270-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5270 OF 2019
Ronak K. Thakkar and ors. … Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra and ors. … Respondents
Ridhi K. Thakkar for the Petitioner. Mr. S.R. Shinde, APP for the Respondent – State. Mr. Chirag J. Mehta for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 13, 2019.
P.C.
1] Petitioner Nos.1 to 3 are present with their advocate. Respondent No.3 is present with her advocate. APP appears for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
2] The consent terms are already recorded in M.J. Petition No. A- 1690 of 2018 before the Family Court at Bandra and those proceedings have been converted into the proceedings under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act.
3] Respondent No.3 is present in the Court and orally she has given no objection. She has fled a separate afdavit reiterating the terms and conditions.
1/2
Dinesh Sherla
33-criwp-5270-19.doc
2/2
Dinesh Sherla
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition connected to consents under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act deserves to be allowed upon settlement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ronak K. Thakkar and ors.
State of Maharashtra and ors.
B.P. Dharmadhikari
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
