The High Court justices dismissed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR. They found the FIR prima facie discloses an offence under section 153 of the IPC and therefore refused to grant the relief.
Prayer for quashing of the subject FIR rejected; Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICITON
WRIT PETITION NO. 5163 OF 2017
Umesh Babubhai Patel. ..Petitioner. Versus
State of Maharashtra & Others.
..Respondents.
Mr. Pawan Mali for the Petitioner.
Mr. Deepak Thakare, PP with Ms. S.D.Shinde, APP for the RespondentState.
Mr. H. S. Venegaonkar for Respondent No. 2 and 3.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ. Date : April 8, 2019 .
P. C. :
of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. We, therefore, cannot accept the prayer for quashing of the subject FIR. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
[SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 1
patilsr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the wording of the FIR supports the conclusion that an offence punishable under section 153 of the IPC has been commissioned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Umesh Babubhai Patel
State of Maharashtra
RANJIT MORE
BHARATI H. DANGRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
