Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after observing that the parties had settled the issue amongst themselves via telephone instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
956 WRIT PETITION NO.5034 OF 2018
LAXMAN HIRAMAN PARDE VERSUS AKSHATA LAXMAN PARDE
... Advocate for Petitioner : Shri Gadegaonkar Bharat N.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. Dated: January 29, 2019 ...
PER COURT :-
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
akl/d
LAXMAN HIRAMAN PARDE
AKSHATA LAXMAN PARDE
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
