of 2017, 358 of 2017 and 359 of 2017. It appears that summons was attempted to be served on the petitioner but the same returned unserved with the remark “Refused, Return to sender’. Thereafter, the petitioner filed four revision applications on 30th November, 2017 before the learned Sessions Judge, Ichalkaranji along with applications for condonation of delay of 18 days. The said applications seeking condonation of delay were rejected by the learned Sessions Judge vide order dated 28th August, 2018. A perusal of all the applications filed by the petitioner for condoning delay in filing the revision applications shows that the petitioner had set out in paragraphs 3 and 4, the reasons for filing the revision applications belatedly i.e after a period of limitation is over. Delay in each of the four cases is, 18 days. The petitioner had shown sufficient cause for condoning the said delay and the learned Sessions Judge ought to have allowed the said applications and condoned the delay of 18 days caused in filing the revision applications, in the interest of justice.
