The High Court of Bombay at Goa disposed of a writ petition concerning pension settlement. The petitioner, who is abroad, accepted the Government's undertaking to withdraw an impugned order and issue a fresh decision after an opportunity of hearing within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 490 OF 2019
INACIO BARRETTO., ... Petitioner
Versus
THE STATE OF GOA, REP. THR. CHIEF SECRETARY AND 4 ORS.,
... Respondents
Mr. Vivek Angelo Rodrigues, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate General with Mr. Shailesh Redkar, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondents.
Coram:M. S. SONAK & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.
Date:5th August, 2019
P.C.:
Heard Mr. Vivek Rodrigues, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. D. Pangam, the learned Advocate General, who appears along with Mr. Shailesh Redkar, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondents. The learned Advocate General states that the impugned Order dated 11.10.2018 be withdrawn and a fresh decision will be taken in the matter within a period of one month from today after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or his representative. His statement is accepted.
2 WP/490/2019
of such hearing can be served upon the Advocate for the petitioner, as, the petitioner is presently abroad.
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. M. S. SONAK, J.
AF
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the relief sought regarding a humanitarian settlement and pension calculation requires disposal on merits or remand for fresh decision.
INACIO BARRETTO.
THE STATE OF GOA
M. S. SONAK
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
