Disposed

Solapur Zilla Madya Vikreta Sanghatana Thru President L S Chakole v. the State of Maharashtra Thru the Prin. Secretary, ( State Excise) and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Apr 2019WP/4735/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the State Government to decide the petitioner's representation under consideration expeditiously on or before 15th April 2019, after which the petitioner withdrew further relief, and the petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction given to the State Government to decide the representation on or before 15th April 2019.

Solapur Zilla Madya Vikreta Sanghatana Thru… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2019)

wp4735.doc

ssp

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.4735 OF 2019

¶7

Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s ordersCourt’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders

¶8

Mr.Vikram S. Undre for the Petitioner

¶9

Mr.Y.S.Khochare, AGP for the Respondent-State.

¶10

CORAM :A.S.OKA AND
 M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.
DATE :APRIL 11, 2019

¶11

P.C.:

¶12

.Not on board. Taken on board.

¶13

1 The learned AGP does not dispute

¶14

that the representation made by the
petitioner is under consideration of
the concerned Authority of the State
Government. We accept the said
statement. Considering the clause 1 of
the impugned order dated 29th March
2019, we direct the respondent to
decide the said representation as
expeditiously as possible and in any
event on or before 15th April 2019.

¶15

2In view of the aforesaid direction,
the learned counsel for the petitioner
states that for the time being he is

¶16

2 wp4735.doc

¶17

not pressing for any relief as prayed
for in this petition. We accept the
said statement.

¶18

3With the above directions, writ
petition is disposed of.

Solapur Zilla Madya Vikreta Sanghatana Thru President L S Chakole v. the State of Maharashtra Thru the Prin. Secretary, ( State Excise) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Solapur Zilla Madya Vikreta Sanghatana Thru President L S Chakole v. the State of Maharashtra Thru the Prin. Secretary, ( State Excise) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs the Commissioner of Cgst and Central Excise

Bhagya Alloys Vs the Commissioner of Central Tax, Pune I

Shri. Narayangad Shikshan Prasarak Mandal , Beed Vs the State Election Commission Thru the State Election Commissioner and Anr.

Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane - Ii, Mumbai Vs M/S Durian Industries Pvt. Ltd. and 25 Ors.

M/S. Osiris Info Tech Pvt. Ltd. through the Representative / the Authority Holder Vs the Appellate Authority the Chief Inspector (Electrical) and Ors.

M/S. Royale Promoters and Builders through Its Partners Vs State of Maharashtra through the Govt. Pleader and Ors.