Petitioner sought permission to withdraw writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The documents submitted earlier were returned. The petition was disposed of.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition was granted. Sealed documents were returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nalawade
908-wp-4554-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4554 OF 2019
XYZ ...Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and ors. ...Respondents
-----
Mr. John Britto for the Petitioner. Mr. A. S. Patil, APP for State. Mr. K. Andrews with Suresh Kumar for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. Mr.Shyam M. Kalyankar for Respondent No.5. Mr. Deepak Livingsten for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATE : 11TH OCTOBER, 2019
PC :
withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition since
he want to assail the order passed by the Magistrate on 29.1.2019, qua
other accused persons also.
Page-1/2
908-wp-4554-19.doc
Nalawade
were submitted by the petitioner along with the list and the said
documents were kept in sealed envelope. The envelope was opened during the course of hearing earlier and even today.
Since the learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission to withdraw the present proceedings, the said documents in the sealed envelope be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after obtaining acknowledgment of the same from the petitioner. Petition is disposed of.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Page-2/2
XYZ
State of Maharashtra and ors.
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
