This Court disposed of a writ petition regarding an identical controversy already adjudicated. Leave was granted for the petitioner to make an appropriate representation to the respondents within two weeks.
Leave granted to make appropriate representation within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Shridhar Sutar 1 29-wp-449.19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 449 OF 2019
Dilip Vasant Mudgul … Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and another … Respondents
Mr. Bhooshan R. Mandlik for the Petitioner. Mr. N. C. Walimbe, AGP for the State.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ DATE : 24th JANUARY, 2019.
P. C.:
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) (B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to leave to make representation regarding an identical controversy already decided.
Dilip Vasant Mudgul
State of Maharashtra
another
B. P. Dharmadikari
Sandeep K. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
