Allowed

Village Panchayat Aldona, Thr. Its Secretary, Pravisha Bhonsle., v. State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC21 Jan 2019WP/44/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order where the petitioner sought a direction to decide pending tax and expenditure sanction issues. The court accepted the government's assurance of final decision within four weeks and disposed of the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Direct respondents to take final decision on sanction of reassessment and expenditure within four weeks.

Village Panchayat Aldona, Thr. Its Secretary, Pravisha… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

mukund 1 wp-44/2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.44 OF 2019

¶4

Village Panchayat, Aldona,
Thr. Its Secretary, Pravisha Bhonsle

¶5

…Petitioner

¶6

 Versus

¶7

State of Goa & Ors.….Respondents

¶8

Mr. Dhaval Damodar Zaveri, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr.Pravin Faldessai, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent
Nos.1 to 3.

¶9

Coram : M.S. Sonak & Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.

¶10

Date : 21 January 2019.

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

Heard Mr. Zaveri, learned counsel for the petitioner and
Mr. Faldessai, learned Additional Government Advocate for the
respondent nos.1 to 3.

¶13

2.The main relief in this petition is to direct the respondents
to take a decision on the issue of sanction for reassessment of taxes and
expenditure, which is pending for a quite some time.

¶14

3.By our order dated 14th January 2019, we had adjourned
the matter in order to enable Mr. Faldessai to obtain instructions as to
the time limit within which the final decision will be taken by the

¶15

mukund 2 wp-44/2019

¶16

respondents in this matter.

¶17

4.Today, Mr. Faldessai, learned Additional Government
Advocate, states that the final decision will be taken regards the
aforesaid issues maximum within a period of four weeks from today.
This statement is made on the basis of instructions from the Director
of Panchayats, who is present in the Court, is accepted.

¶18

5.The acceptance of the aforesaid statement, the main
grievance in the present petition stands redressed. The Director of
Panchayats to take the final decision on the issue of sanction of
reassessment and expenditure, on its own merits, and in accordance
with law within a period of maximum within a period of four weeks
from today.

¶19

6.The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. There
shall be no order as to costs.

¶20

7.All concerned to act on the basis of an authenticated copy
of this order.

¶21

Prithviraj K. Chavan, J. M.S.Sonak, J.

Village Panchayat Aldona, Thr. Its Secretary, Pravisha Bhonsle., v. State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Village Panchayat Aldona, Thr. Its Secretary, Pravisha Bhonsle., v. State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohan Pradeep Dhungat, Presently Lodged in Central Jail, Colvale., Vs State of Goa, Thr. the Police Inspector, Panaji Police Station, Panaji and Anr.

Ganindu Milk and Milk Products Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Its Director, Dnyndeo Ganpati Salunkhe and 2 Ors., Vs the State of Goa, Thr. Police Inspector Cbi/Act, Panaji and 7 Ors.

The Goa Foundation, Thr. Its Secretary, Dr. Claude Alvares., Vs State of Goa, Thr. Chief Secretary and 4 Ors.

Supreme Infrastructure India Ltd., Thr. Its Aut. Sign., Sunil Vitthal Patil., Vs Goa State Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd., Govt. of Goa and 4 Ors.

Tom Menino Monteiro, by His Attorney, Waman K. Nayak., Vs State of Goa, Thr. Chief Secretary and 6 Ors.

Rajeninata Alias Rajaninath Shirodkar and Anr., Vs Kamakshi Saunsthan Shiroda and 3 Ors.