In Criminal Writ Petition No. 433 of 2018, filed by Sanjay Pandurang Patil and Ors., the single-judge bench dismissed the petition for want of prosecution as the petitioners' counsel failed to appear on the listed dates.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8.WP.433.2018.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 433 OF 2018
Sanjay Pandurang Patil and Ors. ...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. A.R. Patil, APP for Respondent – State.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 03rd SEPTEMBER 2019
P.C.:
was called out none appears for the Petitioner. Therefore, this Court observed in the said order that by way of last opportunity stand over to
3rd September 2019. Even today none appears for the Petitioner. In
that view of the matter Writ Petition stand dismissed for want of prosecution.
(S.S. SHINDE, J.)
Umesh Malani
Sanjay Pandurang Patil and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
