Dismissed

Bhikaji Pandharinath Sonar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC22 Jan 2019WP/4125/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a combined writ and contempt petition, the Supreme Court of the State of Maharashtra was approached for refund of a deposited nazrana amount after its cited order was superseded by a Collector's regularization order. The court permitted the withdrawal of principal and interest, discharged a donation order, and disposed of the contempt petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners permitted to withdraw Rs.16,00,000/- and interest; Rs.50,000/- directed for donation; contempt petition disposed of.

Bhikaji Pandharinath Sonar and Others Vs the State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.4125 OF 2016 (Bhikaji Pandharinath Sonar and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.434 OF 2016

¶4

Mr.V.B.Patil, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.S.R.Yadav, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 7/State.

¶5

( CORAM : Ravindra V.Ghuge, J.)

¶6

DATE : 22/01/2019

¶7

PER COURT :

¶8

The learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that an amount of Rs.16,00,000/- pursuant to the order of this Court dated 11/04/2016 was deposited in this Court on 05/05/2016.

¶9

The Learned AGP submits that the impugned order dated 22/04/2016 would not survive as the disputed issue with regard to the Nazrana amount was subsequently regularized by the Collector, Jalgaon in view of the necessary compliances made by the petitioner, owing to the order of the District Collector dated 12/03/2018. The amount of Rs.16,33,594/- was paid by the petitioner directly in the Office of the District Collector, Jalgaon.

¶10

khs/JAN.2019/4125-d

¶11

- 2 -

¶12

In view of the above, the learned Advocate for the petitioners prays for refund of the amount of Rs.16,00,000/- deposited by him in this Court on 05/05/2016, alongwith accrued interest.

¶13

Mr.Patil, learned Advocate submits on instructions of the petitioners that, out of the interest amount that has accumulated in view of the said deposit, the petitioners desire to donate an amount of Rs.50,000/- for the treatment of poor and deprived patients admitted in the Ghati Hospital. This Court acknowledges the gracious gesture of these petitioners.

¶14

In view of the above, this petition is disposed of as the impugned order dated 22/04/2016 does not survive and stands replaced by the subsequent direction dated 12/03/2018.

¶15

An amount of Rs.50,000/- shall be transferred by the Registry of this Court to the Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, through Medical Officer, High Court Dispensary, Aurangabad, by cheque or Demand Draft (Demand Draft be drawn in the name of “ Dean, Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad Dengi Samiti”) , expeditiously and report compliance of

¶16

khs/JAN.2019/4125-d

¶17

- 3 -

¶18

the same within 3 (three) weeks from today. Excluding the said amount of Rs.50,000/-, the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the remainder amount i.e. Rs.16,00,000/- and the interest amount.

¶19

These 3 petitioners shall make individual applications duly identified by the learned Advocate alongwith their recent photograph, bank account number, photostat copy of the bank account passbook, self attested copy of their income tax PAN card and recent address proof.

¶20

In so far as the 68 R land is concerned, which is said to have been acquired under the National Highways Act, the petitioners would be at liberty to resort to a remedy as is permissible in law in the event of any grievance.

¶21

In view of the above, learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that the contempt proceedings can be disposed of. As such, the said contempt petition stands disposed of.

¶22

( Ravindra V.Ghuge, J.)

¶23

khs/JAN.2019/4125-d

Bhikaji Pandharinath Sonar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhikaji Pandharinath Sonar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepa Shama Pawar and Others Vs Roshanbee Shaikh Rahim Thr Lrs Shaikh Maheboob Shaikh Rahim Thr Lrs Sharifabee Shaikh Maheboob Ors.

Girdharilal Hiralalji Agrawal Vs Kishanprasad Motilal Devidan and Another

Jaypalsing Devising Rawal and Another Vs the Collector Dhule and Others

Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth Rahuri Dist Ahmednagar Vs Chandrabhagabai Vitthal Patil

Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth Rahuri Dist Ahmednagar Vs Mirabai Devidas Nikam

Anil Waman Patil Vs Gambhir Devram Mahajan and Another