Petitioner sought refund for unexcavated sand. This bench held that the state government represents the proper forum and left all questions open there.
Writ petition dismissed; petitioner directed to approach State Government via representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1001wp4043.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Writ Petition No.4043 of 2017 Shri Kadir s/o Kismetulla Sheikh, Bhandara Versus The Collector, Bhandara, and another.
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order
Shri S.K. Mishra, Senior Advocate, assisted by Shri Kaustubh Deogade, Advocate for Petitioner.
Shri N.R. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondents.
Coram : R.K. Deshpande & Vinay Joshi, JJ. Dated : 10th January, 2019
The petitioner has remedy to approach the State Government by making a representation under the policy of the Government for refund of the amount of unexcavated sand. We leave all questions open to be agitated before the State Government.
With these observations, the petition is dismissed.
(Vinay Joshi, J.) (R.K. Deshpande, J.)
Lanjewar
Shri Kadir s/o Kismetulla Sheikh
The Collector, Bhandara
another
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
