The Bombay High Court held that mere inclusion of petitioners in the list of eligible teachers for transfer does not create an enforceable right.
petition dismissed; no rights created by inclusion in transfer list.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3976/2019
(Raju Baburao Lanjewar and others vs. The State of Maharashtra and others )
................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Shri P.S. Kshirsagar, Advocate for petitioners Shri A.M.Deshpande, Addl.G.P.for respondent no.1
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 10th June, 2019.
Heard.
Merely because of the names of the petitioners are included in the list of eligible teachers to be transferred does not give rise to any enforceable right in prayer of the petitioners.
The Writ Petition is dismissed.
JUDGE
JUDGE
sahare
1 issue framed by the court
Whether inclusion of petitioners' names in the list of eligible teachers for transfer creates an enforceable right.
Raju Baburao Lanjewar
The State of Maharashtra
R.K. DESHPANDE
VINAY JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
