Single judge permitted withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 3947 of 2016 with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate court for second appeal to challenge the impugned order.
Withdrawal of the Writ Petition allowed with liberty to take recourse of appropriate remedy in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
504...doc
DDR
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3947 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court’sCourt’s or Judge’s orders
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Shri Bhushan Walimbe i/b. Ms. Preeti Walimbe
for petitioner.
Shri M.P. Panchakshari for respondent Nos. 1 and
2.
CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J. DATE : 4th OCTOBER, 2019
P.C.
Not on Board. Taken on Board.
2.Learned counsel for the petitioner states
that appropriate remedy to challenge the
impugned order is by way of Second Appeal.
3.The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn
with liberty to take recourse of appropriate
remedy in law.
Digitally signed by Diksha Diksha Rane Rane Date:2019.10.04 18:54:03 +0530
1 Of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for withdrawal with liberty to pursue other remedies shall be allowed.
Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court