Two writ petitions were filed by petitioners against the Additional Commissioner. During hearing, the petitioner sought and obtained leave to withdraw the petitions. The court disposed of both petitions as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petitions was granted; petitions disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
908-909wp384-392.19.doc
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.384 of 2019
Shivaji Dnyanoba Shelke ... Petitioner
V/s.
The Addl. Commissioner Tribal ... Development, Thane & anr. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.392 OF 2019
Mukund Narhari Ghodke ... Petitioner V/s. The Addl. Commissioner Tribal ... Development, Thane & anr. Respondents
Mr.N.P.Dalvi for the petitioner. Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for the State.
CORAM :NARESH H. PATIL, C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J. 17th January, 2019.
2/2 908-909wp384-392.19.doc
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing for petitioners on instructions of petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave is granted.
N.M. JAMDAR, J CHIEF JUSTICE
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
Shivaji Dnyanoba Shelke
Mukund Narhari Ghodke
The Addl. Commissioner Tribal ... Development, Thane
NARESH H. PATIL
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
