Two writ petitions were disposed of as withdrawn by the Court. The petitioners had instructed their counsel to withdraw both pending writ petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp.3511 and 5464.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3511 OF 2016
Kundlik s/o. Murlidhar Ghuge
and anr.
..Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
and ors.
..Respondents
Mr. N.B.Narwade, Advocate for petitioners
Mr. P.M.Kulkarni, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3
Mr. N.V.Gaware, Advocate for respondent no.4
AND
WRIT PETITION NO.5464 OF 2016
Kundlik s/o. Murlidhar Ghuge
and anr.
..Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
and ors...Respondents
Mr. S.R.Zambre, Advocate h/f. Mr.N.B.Narwade, Advocate
for petitioners
Mr. P.M.Kulkarni, AGP for respondent no.1
Mr. S.K.Kadam, Advocate for respondent no.2
Mr. N.V.Gaware, Advocate for respondent nos.4 and 5
CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 19, 2019
2 wp.3511 and 5464
PER COURT :-
Mr.Narwade, learned Counsel for the
petitioners, informs to have instructions to withdraw
both the Writ Petitions. In view of the above, Both
the Writ Petitions stand disposed of as withdrawn.
kbp
Kundlik s/o. Murlidhar Ghuge
The State of Maharashtra
R.G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court