The High Court of Bombay dismissed Writ Petition No. 3461 of 2016, filed by Yuvraj Keshav Karale against the State of Maharashtra, on the ground that the petitioner lacked locus standi, relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan vs State of Maharashtra.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 25WP 3461 of 2016.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3461 OF 2016
Yuvraj Keshav Karale … Petitioner
Vs
State of Maharashtra & ors.
... Respondents
Mr. Tanaji Jadhav i/b. R.K. Mendadkar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Ms. P.N. Solunke, AGP for State.
CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ DATE : AUGUST 28 th , 2019
P.C.:
In view of Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan vs State of Maharashtra & Ors : 2013 (4) SCC 465 , as the petitioner does not have locus, petition is rejected.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Prachi Potdar
1/1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has locus standi to file the writ petition?
Whether the petition should be rejected based on the decision in Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan vs State of Maharashtra & OrsFollowed¶12
Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan vs State of Maharashtra & Ors : 2013 (4) SCC 465 · Who else cites this
Yuvraj Keshav Karale
State of Maharashtra & ors.
B. P. Dharmadhikari
Sandeep K. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
