This order records the withdrawal of a writ petition. The petitioners sought leave to withdraw, the letters were noted, and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn without costs.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 3357.19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3357 OF 2019
SANJAY WAMAN JADHAV AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD,
JALGAON AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Y. B. Bolkar
Advocate for Respondents No. 1 & 2 :
Mr. M. S. Sonawane
...
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE: 14th AUGUST, 2019
PER COURT:
1.The learned counsel for the petitioners
submits that in view of the subsequent development
the petitioners seek leave to withdraw the writ
petition. The letters placed by the learned
counsel for the petitioners are taken on record.
2. In view of that, writ petition is disposed of
as withdrawn.No costs.
[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
marathe
SANJAY WAMAN JADHAV AND ANOTHER
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, JALGAON AND ANOTHER
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court