Ishrat Ali v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-line order declining to intervene in the matter at this stage while keeping petitioners' contentions open for future adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
21-WP-331-19.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.331 OF 2019
Israt Ali
...Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
...Respondents
Mr. Mahesh Bondre a/w Ms. Jaya Misal i/b MMB Associates for the Petitioner.
Ms. S. D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. DATE : 07/03/2019.
P.C.:
. Perused the FIR. At this stage we are not inclined to intervene in the matter. We keep all contentions of the petitioner open and with liberty to him to raise the same at appropriate juncture, we dispose of the present challenge.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
(B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Israt Ali
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. Dharmadhikari
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court