The Court directed the Appellate Authority to decide the pending appeal concerning the rejection of parole leave within four weeks and partly allowed the petition, disposing of the matter with no costs.
Direction to Respondent No.2 to decide the appeal on merits within four weeks; petition partly allowed and disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
5-DATE-WP-3290-19.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3290 OF 2019
Atul Ashok Deshmukh
...Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
...Respondents
Mr.Omkar G. Nagwekar for the Petitioner. Mr. J.P.Yagnik, APP for the Respondent/State
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 03/07/2019.
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel. One of the prayers is to expedite consideration of appeal pending before Respondent No.2. The said appeal has been preferred against the order of Additional Commissioner dated 14/11/2018 rejecting parole leave to the petitioner.
(SMT. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.)
(B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Appellate Authority should decide the pending appeal regarding parole within four weeks.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Atul Ashok Deshmukh
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2 (Appellate Authority)
B. P. Dharmadikari
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
