Hon'ble High Court of Bombay at Goa dismissed a writ petition against a CCI order recorded statements for missing documents. The Court held delay and laches were sufficient to refuse relief.
The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 316 OF 2019
CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER ADDITIONAL GM (ADMN) BSNL OFFICE OF PGMTD (TELECOM) AND ANR., ... Petitioners
Versus
SUNANDA ASHOK PATIL AND ANR., ... Respondents
Mr. P.P. Singh, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. A.D. Bhobe with Ms. Kalpa Govekar, Advocates for the Respondents.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:4th June 2019
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Mr. Singh, the learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Bhobe, the learned Counsel for the respondents.
WP/316/2019
2
respondents (who will supply to the petitioners the relevant documents) and inform the respondents the factual position in the matter, within 15 days.
WP/316/2019
3
C. V. BHADANG, J.
EV
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay and laches prevent entertaining the writ petition challenging the CCI order.
Whether failure to record the petitioner's statement before the CCI permits interference in the impugned order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER ADDITIONAL GM (ADMN) BSNL OFFICE OF PGMTD (TELECOM) AND ANR.
SUNANDA ASHOK PATIL AND ANR.
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
