The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed Writ Petition No. 309 of 2017 as infructuous based on the admission of counsel for both the petitioner and respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
0401wp309.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
WRIT PETITION NO. 309 OF 2017
(Sunil Pralhad Budhwat & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Department of Higher and Technical Education & Ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,_____________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE &
VINAY JOSHI, JJ. JANUARY 04, 2019 .
Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri P.S. Tembhare, learned AGP for respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
The writ petition has become infructuous and this statement is made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGP.
Therefore, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*GS.
Sunil Pralhad Budhwat & Ors.
State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Department of Higher and Technical Education & Ors.
R.K. DESHPANDE
VINAY JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
