The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of a writ petition challenging a conviction as infructuous since the petitioner had been acquitted by the Designated Court on 22/11/2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
47-WP-3014-16.doc
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3014 OF 2016
Sajid Choudhary
...Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
...Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Dr. F. R. Shaih, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI &
N.R. BORKAR , JJ.
DATE : 05/12/2019.
P.C.:
Nobody for the petitioner even today.
2.Learned APP informs that present prayer for quashing has
become infructuous since he has been acquitted by the Designated Court on
22/11/2017.
3.Communication received by office of PP from Sr. P. I., Wadala
Police Station dated 20/11/2019 is taken on record and marked Exhibit “A”.
4.In view of acquittal of the petitioner, present challenge does
not survive. The petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(N. R. BORKAR, J.)
(B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Sajid Choudhary
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. Dharmadhikari
N. R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court