Allowed

Shri. Ratnakar Vasantrao Chogle and Ors. v. Harishchandra Undrya Mhase and Ors.

Bombay HC27 Sept 2019WP/2905/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed withdrawal of three writ petitions and three civil applications filed by Shri Ratnkar Vasantrao Chogle and ors against respective respondents, with liberty to prefer subsequent remedies under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file Revision before State Government; civil applications disposed of accordingly.

Shri. Ratnakar Vasantrao Chogle and Ors. Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

wp 2904.15.doc

¶2

Urmila Ingale

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 2903 OF 2015 WITH

¶6

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7 OF 2018

¶7

Shri Ratnkar Vasantrao Chogle and ors... Petitioners
Vs.

¶8

Chandrakant Raghunath Garel
(deceased thru, Lrs.)
1a. Smt.Yashoda Dilip Kamble and ors... Respondents

¶9

ALONG WITH

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO. 2904 OF 2015 WITH

¶11

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8 OF 2018

¶12

Shri Ratnkar Vasantrao Chogle and ors... Petitioners
Vs.

¶13

Smt.Bani Damu Patel and ors... Respondents

¶14

ALONG WITH

¶15

WRIT PETITION NO. 2905 OF 2015 WITH

¶16

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9 OF 2018

¶17

Shri Ratnkar Vasantrao Chogle and ors... Petitioners
Vs.

¶18

Harishchandra Undrya Mhase and ors... Respondents

¶19

Mr.Prashant P. More, for the Petitioners.
Mr.Sandeep Babar, AGP for State.

¶20

1/3

¶21

wp 2904.15.doc

¶22

CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.

¶23

 DATE : 27th SEPTEMBER 2019

¶24

P.C.:

¶25

.Not on board. Taken on board.

¶26

2.Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that
against the order impugned in these Petitions, there is remedy of
filing Revision before the State Government under the
Maharashtra Land Revenue Code by virtue of amendment dated
11/04/2016. He therefore seeks leave to withdraw these
Petitions.

¶27

3.Writ Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn with

¶28

liberty to prefer Revision before the State Government. All
contentions on merits are kept open.

¶29

4.Hon’ble Minister to consider the time consumed in

¶30

prosecuting present Petitions as bonafide in the event if an
application is made for condonation of delay.

¶31

2/3

¶32

wp 2904.15.doc

¶33

5.In view of withdrawal of the Petitions, Civil
applications does not survive and the same shall stand disposed
of as such.

¶34

 (M.S.KARNIK, J.)

¶35

Digitally signed Urmila by Urmila P. Ingle Date: 2019.10.01 P. Ingle 17:01:18 +0530

¶36

3/3

Shri. Ratnakar Vasantrao Chogle and Ors. v. Harishchandra Undrya Mhase and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Ratnakar Vasantrao Chogle and Ors. v. Harishchandra Undrya Mhase and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Taradas Shivram Vatkar Decd Thru Lr Vs Dhondiram Dadu Gawali Decd Thru Lr and Anr.

Shri. Sachin Dnyanoba Wakadkar and Anr. Vs Shri. Dnyanoba Vithoba Wakadkar and Ors.

Mr. Shantaram Baburao Malusare Vs Mr. Shankar Dadu Malusare and Ors.

Shri. Shankar Dattatraya Kemse Vs Surajnagar Chsl through Its Chairman and Secretary and Ors.

Shri. Ratnakar Vasantrao Chogle and Ors. Vs Smt. Bani Damu Patel and Ors.

Shri. Ratnakar Vasantrao Chogle and Ors. Vs Chandrakatn Raghunath Garel (Decd) through Lrs and Ors.