The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed two writ petitions and an ancillary civil application for want of prosecution, as the petitioners and their advocate were absent on the day of hearing despite two previous listings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(5)ASWP2865.15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2865 OF 2015
Rupali d/o Sambhaji Hande … Petitioner Vs 1 Leela Education Society & Ors. ... Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2937 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2865 OF 2015
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2866 OF 2015
Deepak s/o Srichand Manglani … Petitioner Vs 1 Leela Education Society & Ors. ... Respondents
None for the Petitioners.
Ms. Rimi Jain i/b Rui Rodrigues for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & M.S. KARNIK , JJ.
WEDNESDAY, 6TH FEBRUARY, 2019
P.C. :
1 The writ petitioners and their advocate, both are absent. We have found that the petitions were listed twice previously, but on both occasions they could not be taken up.
Today, when the petitions are called out, the petitioners and the
SRP 1/2
(5)ASWP2865.15.doc
advocate, both are absent. Their names are correctly displayed on the Board. Two advocates have f i led Vakalatnama for the petitioners and both are absent.
2 The petitions are, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. In view of the dismissal of the petitions, nothing survives in the Civil Application and it, accordingly, stands disposed of.
M.S. KARNIK, J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
SRP 2/2
Rupali d/o Sambhaji Hande
Deepak s/o Srichand Manglani
Leela Education Society
S.C. Dharmadhikari
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
