Shambhu Sharan Saxena v. Bombay Municipal Corporation
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21 wp 2857.14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2857 OF 2014
Shambhu Sharan Saxena …...Petitioner versus Bombay Municipal Corporation …...Respondent
None for the petitioner.
Ms. Sheetal Metkari, advocate for the Corporation.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.
DATE : 1st FEBRUARY, 2019.
P. C. :
None appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was called out today. On the last occasion i.e. on 4th January, 2019 also, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default.
[SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shambhu Sharan Saxena
- respondent
Bombay Municipal Corporation
Coram
Ranjit More
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Canara Bank , through Mrs. Manisha Deepak Varunkar Vs State of Maharashtra, through Govt Pld. and Ors.
Ramakrishna Chilivery and Ors. Vs the Municipal Corp. of Greater Mumbai and Ors.
M/S. Jaibhavani Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ,Beed Vs the State of Maharashtra Thru Principal Secretary, Home ( State Excise) Dept. and Ors.
Tukaram Babu Naik and Ors. Vs the City and Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. and Ors.