Single judge disposed of this writ petition challenging the rejection of an application for condonation of delay, observing that the application itself was unwarranted given the underlying facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
924 WRIT PETITION NO.2707 OF 2016
ABDUL JABBAR ABDUL GAFUR VERSUS ASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER NANDED AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Shri Gunale V.D. AGP for Respondent 1 : Shri Bhagat N.T. Advocate for Respondent 2 : Smt. Ansari A.N.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. Dated: February 06, 2019 ...
PER COURT :-
akl/d
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
2- WRIT PETITION NO.2707 OF 2016
required to be passed since the very application Exhibit 16 appears to be unwarranted. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Exhibit 16 was actually unwarranted and should not have been filed.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
akl/d
ABDUL JABBAR ABDUL GAFUR
ASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER NANDED
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
