This writ petition challenging permission for forest land diversion was disposed of without prolonged consideration as the project was already operational.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17 wp 2626 of 2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2626 OF 2013
M/s. Sanchay Properties Pvt. Ltd. And Anr.
… Petitioners
versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
… Respondents
Mr. Ashok Bobe i/by Mr. V.A.Gangal, Mr. Anup Deshpande, for Petitioners.
Ms. K.N.Salunke, AGP, for Respondent State.
Mr. Tejas Hartalkar i/by Mr. Shailendra S. Kanetkar, for Respondent No.6.
Mr. D.R.Shah i/by Mr. H.V.Mehta, for Respondent No.8.
CORAM: AKIL KURESHI & S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE: 20th AUGUST, 2019
P.C.:
SSP
17 wp 2626 of 2013.doc
wind power project. However, on fimsy grounds that the Petitioners did not fulfll certain conditions, the Application of the Respondent No.9 came to be allowed in a hurry..
SSP 2/3
17 wp 2626 of 2013.doc
observations.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
3/3
SSP
M/s. Sanchay Properties Pvt. Ltd. And Anr.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Akil Kureshi
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
