Criminal Writ Petition allowed on withdrawal by the petitioner. Court clarified that a specific service provider must preserve CDRs until the conclusion of the trial.
Petition disposed of on withdrawal with liberty to approach trial court; service provider directed to preserve CDRs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-WP-2385-2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2385 OF 2019
AVINASH GANESH KULKARNI)...PETITIONER
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.)...RESPONDENTS
Mr.Vaibhav Bagade a/w. Ms.Nilima Kasture, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
Mr.Vinod Chate, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM:A. M. BADAR, J.
DATE:10th OCTOBER 2019
P.C.:
1The learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing
the matter for sometime seeks permission to withdraw the petition
with liberty to approach the trial court as and when contingency
arises.
avk 1/2
4-WP-2385-2019.doc
2The writ petition is, therefore, disposed off as
withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.
3However, it is clarified that respondent no.2 service
provider shall preserve the CDRs as directed vide interim order
dated 11th July 2019 till the conclusion of the subject trial.
avk 2/2
Avinash Ganesh Kulkarni
The State of Maharashtra
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court