Writ petition challenging an interlocutory order was disposed off as infructuous since the main proceedings were closed and a revision is pending. Petitioners consented to keep contentions open in revision.
all contentions of the litigating sides are kept open in the pending proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
40-wp-2297-18.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2297 OF 2018
KAMALABAI RADHAKISHAN KHANDELWAL AND OTHERS VERSUS THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND CO OPERATIVE OFFICER AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri M. R. Sonawane AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 4 : Shri S. W. Munde Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 : Shri K. D. Jadhav
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATED : 4th MARCH, 2019.
PER COURT :
has received certain documents from the respondents indicating that this petition would be rendered infructuous. He, therefore, submits that even if this petition is rendered
40-wp-2297-18.odt
2
infructuous, all the contentions of the litigating sides be kept open in the pending revision.
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
shp/-
KAMALABAI RADHAKISHAN KHANDELWAL AND OTHERS
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND CO OPERATIVE OFFICER AND OTHERS
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
