The criminal writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared for successive calls, indicating the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp.2156.17.20.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2156 OF 2017
Pradeep Prabhashankar Saboo ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioner
Mr. P. H. Gaikwad-Patil, A.P.P for the Respondent No.2-State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. WEDNESDAY, 27th NOVEMBER 2019
P.C. :
1 None appeared for the petitioner on the first call. Even on the second call, none appears for the petitioner. The petition is of the year 2018. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the petition.
2 Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
1/1
SQ Pathan
Pradeep Prabhashankar Saboo
The State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
