Petitioner withdrew the writ petition challenging a dismissal of a frivolous application filed solely to delay condonation of delay in an appeal.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 915) wp2025-19.doc
SAS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2025 OF 2019
Hanmant Bandu Patil ..Petitioner. V/s. Shankar Bhau Patil & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.Kalpesh U.Patil for the petitioner.
None for the respondents.
CORAM: M.S.SONAK, J.
DATE : MARCH 12, 2019
P.C.:-
After this matter was argued for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition. Leave is granted. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
2 915) wp2025-19.doc
and the same is well explained, obviously, the petitioner had no right to insist upon the respondent leading evidence in the matter. The intent of the petitioner is to delay the proceedings and to avoid the adjudication of the appeal on merits. Therefore, when this Court was about to dismiss this petition by imposing costs, learned counsel for the petitioner has sought for leave to withdraw this petition.
Harmant Bandu Patil
Shankar Bhau Patil
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
