Puran Parviz Niroo and 8 Ors. Vs the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and 2 Ors.

Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w Mr. Vatsal Merchant and Mr. Sharad Wakchaure I/b Kishore Thakordas & Co. for the respondent no.3 Mr. Kamlesh Ghumre for the respondent nos. 1 and 2

¶11

CORAM : A.S. OKA & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J.

¶12

DATED : 2^nd APRIL, 2019

¶13

P.C.

¶14

The learned Counsel appearing for the first and second respondents, on telephonic instructions from Shri. Umesh Mane, Deputy Engineer (FS) and Ms. Meenal Jagtap, Executive Engineer (FS), states that the first and second respondents will withdraw notices / orders dated 30^th November, 2017 and 6^th December 2017 (Exhibits - “P” and “R” respectively) and will initiate proceedings under Section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 only after leave is granted by the concerned Court, which has appointed the Court

1 of 2

2014-18-WP-905=.doc

Uday S. Jagtap

Receiver.

We accept the statement made on instructions. Therefore, challenge to the impugned notices / orders at Exhibits “P” and “R” does not survive.

¶20

In view of acceptance of the aforesaid statement made by the first and second respondents, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition on the ground that other prayers made in the petition are premature.

¶21

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

¶22

(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (A. S. OKA, J.)

¶23

2 of 2

Puran Parviz Niroo and 8 Ors. v. the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Puran Parviz Niroo and 8 Ors. v. the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhandup Vakratunda Sra Chs Ltd. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Govt. Pleader High Court Bombay and 4 Ors.

Mangala Tukaram Bhavekar Vs Deputy Collector (Encroachment and Eviction) and Competent Authority and 4 Ors.

the commissioner ofcentral excise -thane-ii Vs m/s milton polyplas (i) p.ltd and 2 Ors.

Anjani Mehta Vs State of Maharashtra through Govt. Pleader High Court O.S. and Anr.

Nitin Hargovind Vishngara Vs the State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

Sunil Patil and 7 Ors. Vs the Charity Commissioner and Anr.