High Court dismissed a criminal writ petition challenging an order refusing to recall a prosecution witness. The court found no grounds established for recalling the witness and directed the trial to proceed.
The petition challenging the order refusing to recall prosecution witness PW5 was dismissed summarily.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
wp.164.2019_514.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.164 OF 2019
Manish Krishna Kalburgi … Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr.Satyavrat Joshi for the Petitioner Ms.Veera Shinde, APP, for the Respondent – State
CORAM: Mrs.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATED: JANUARY 23, 2019
P.C.:
Criminal Procedure Code.
Page 1 of 2
wp.164.2019_514.doc
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition challenging the refusal to recall a prosecution witness under Section 311 CrPC warrants interference.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Manish Krishna Kalburgi
The State of Maharashtra
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
