The High Court of Bombay disposed of a criminal writ petition filed by Sandeep Steels as infructuous because the respondents acquitted in the contesting trial
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
926.6.wp-1470-2018.doc
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1470 OF 2018
Sandeep Steels
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Siddharth Murarka a/w. Mr.Devendra Tiwari I/b. Law Chamber of Siddharth Murarka for the Petitioner. Mr.A.R.Patil, APP for the Respondent – State.
Mr.Mikadad Aziz Zummerwala i/b. Mrs.Poonam Ankleshwaria for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 6th SEPTEMBER 2019
P.C.:
contesting respondents, submits that respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are
acquitted by the trial Court.
position that contesting respondents are acquitted by the trial Court. He submits that in view of acquittal of the contesting respondents by
the trial Court, this petition has become infructuous except question
of law raised in the petition.
Trupti
926.6.wp-1470-2018.doc
2/2
(S.S. SHINDE, J.)
Trupti
Sandeep Steels
State of Maharashtra
Respondent Nos. 2 to 4
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
