In Criminal Writ Petition No. 1442 of 2017, the Bombay High Court rejected the petitioner's prayer for writ relief. The court held that as the charge was framed during the petition's pendency, it could not grant the relief, keeping defense contentions open before the special court.
Prayer of the petitioner rejected; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19 wp 1442-17.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1442 OF 2017
Vishvanath Ramkrishna Nayak
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondents
Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey i/b. SAVJ Law Solutions for Petitioner. Ms. Rebecca Gonsalvez, for Respondent No. 1. Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, APP for Respondent – State.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER 2019
PER COURT:
before the concerned Court.
[S.S. SHINDE, J.]
Bhagyawant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to accede to the prayer of the petitioner given the framing of charge during its pendency.
Vishvanath Ramkrishna Nayak
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
