Disposed

Waman Appareddy Sampate and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC11 Nov 2019WP/1416/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Aurangabad disposed of three writ petitions wherein petitioners claimed their applications for rental compensation evaded adjudication. The Court directed them to file applications with the Special Land Acquisition Officer, mandating a decision within nine months.

What did the court decide?

Directing petitioners to file applications with the Special Land Acquisition Officer and deciding them expeditiously within nine months.

Waman Appareddy Sampate and Others Vs the State of… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1 2-WP1413-19+.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

2 WRIT PETITION NO. 1413 OF 2019

¶4

Sadashiv Sopanrao Gude

¶5

.. Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra and Another

¶8

.. Respondents

¶9

Mr. Suraj V. Gundre, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. P. S. Patil, Addl. G. P. for Respondents-State.

¶10

3 WRIT PETITION NO. 1414 OF 2019

¶11

Kusumbai Shamrao Haridas.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Another.. Respondents

¶12

Mr. Suraj V. Gundre, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. S. G. Karlekar, A. G. P. for Respondents-State.

¶13

4 WRIT PETITION NO. 1416 OF 2019

¶14

Waman Appareddy Sampate and Others.. Petitioners

¶15

Versus

¶16

The State of Maharashtra and Another.. Respondents

¶17

Mr. Suraj V. Gundre, Advocate for Petitioners.
Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, A. G. P. for Respondents-State.

¶18

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

¶19

 DATED : 11th NOVEMBER, 2019.

¶20

1 of 2

¶21

2 2-WP1413-19+.odt

¶22

PER COURT:-

¶23

1.The grievance of the petitioners is that they have filed
application for rental compensation to the Collector. The same is not
yet decided.

¶24

2.In fact, application has to be filed with the Special Land
Acquisition Officer. He has to decide it after hearing the parties
concerned.

¶25

3.The petitioners may file an application with the Special Land
Acquisition Officer for grant of rental compensation. Upon receipt of
application, the Special Land Acquisition Officer shall decide the said
application on its own merits, after hearing the petitioners and the
acquiring body, expeditiously and preferably within a period of nine
(09) months from the date of application.

¶26

4. Writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

¶27

( MANGESH S. PATIL )( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
 JUDGE JUDGE

¶28

P.S.B.

¶29

2 of 2

Waman Appareddy Sampate and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Waman Appareddy Sampate and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaikh Sikandar Shaikh Budhan Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Others

Jumne Khan Ashraf Khan through Lrs Akbari Beum Jumme Khan and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Deepak Chandrashekhar Balwatkar Vs the Schedueld Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee through Its Chairman and Others

Kusumbai Shamrao Haridas Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Sadashiv Sopanrao Gude Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Manisha Dipak Samudre Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others