Petitioners withdrew a writ petition against District Magistrate, North Goa, seeking liberty to approach Debts Recovery Tribunal under the SARFAESI Act, 2002.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted with liberty to take appropriate proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 137 OF 2019
SHILPI CONSTRUCTIONS, THR. THEIR PROP. PET. NO. 2 AND ANR.,
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NORTH GOA, PANAJI AND ANR., ... Respondents
Mr. A. R. Kantak and Mr. R. Kantak, Advocates for the petitioners.
Mr. A. Talaulikar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondent no.1. Mr. Raunaq Rao, Advocate for the respondent no.2.
Coram:M. S. SONAK & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.
Date:30th January 2019
P.C.
After this matter was argued for sometime, learned Counsel for the Petitioners upon instructions from the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition. with liberty to take out appropriate proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, under the provisions of Securitization and Reconstruction Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. He states that the petitioners will resort to the remedy provided under the said Act without prejudice to their contentions that the provisions of the said Act in fact do not apply to the security offered by them.
WP/137/2019
2
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. M. S. SONAK, J.
vn
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shilpi Constructions
District Magistrate, North Goa, Panaji
Another Respondent
M. S. Sonak
Prithviraj K. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
