The petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the writ petition with right reserved. The court noted the withdrawal was not pressed and dismissed the petition without deciding on the withdrawal liberty.
Liberty to withdraw reserved; Petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(6)WP1358918.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.13589 OF 2018
Vijay Ramchandra Khapare and others ..Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents
Mr. N. V. Bandiwadekar a/w Mr. Chetan Patil, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATE : 3rd SEPTEMBER, 2019
P.C.
1] There being no averments in the Petition regarding sanctioned posts with the Petitioners for which grant-in-aid was admitted, much less with proof thereof, counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with right reserved to file a fresh Petition making same prayer but after pleading facts giving birth to a cause of action.
2] Granting liberty as prayed for the Petition is dismissed as
not pressed.
SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J
CHIEF JUSTICE
1 o f 1
BGP.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay Ramchandra Khapare and others
State of Maharashtra and others
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
BHARATI DANGRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
