Dismissed

Sai Heritage Co-Op. Housing Society Ltd. through Its Chairman Dr. Prashyant R. Dharmadhikari v. M/S. Saibaba Builders and Developers and Ors.

Bombay HC28 Jan 2019WP/13311/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking interference with an order rejecting an application for electricity bill directions. The court held that liability is central to the pending specific performance suit and interference is not necessary.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sai Heritage Co-Op. Housing Society Ltd… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

WP 13311.17.doc

¶2

¶3

JPP

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 13311 OF 2017

¶6

Sai Heritage Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. … Petitioner.

¶7

V/s.

¶8

M/s. Saibaba Builders and Developers & Ors. ... Respondents.

¶9

Mr. R.S. Gadekar I/b. S.P. Deo for the Petitioner. Mr. Pavan S. Patil for Respondent 1.

¶10

CORAM : N.M. Jamdar, J.

¶11

DATE : 28 January, 2019.

¶12

P.C. :-

¶13

The Petitioner – Plaintiff has challenged the order passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pune dated 12 September 2017, rejecting the application filed by the Petitioner below Exhibit 175 in the Suit RCS No.42 of 2005 instituted by it.

¶14

The Petitioner is a Co-operative Housing Society and the Respondent – Defendant is a developer. A Suit is filed for specific performance, declaration and injunction. In this Suit, an application was taken out by the Petitioner – Plaintiff for directions to the Respondent – Developer to pay the electricity bills of the premises.

¶15

WP 13311.17.doc

¶16

¶17

As the learned Civil Judge has noted the respective liabilities of the parties to pay the maintenance, etc. is the subject matter of dispute in the Suit. The members of the Petitioner – Society are admittedly in possession and are consuming the electricity. It appears that the Petitioner had paid the charges for some period.

¶18

In these circumstances and in view of the fact that the Suit is pending where the arguments regarding the liability would be considered on their own merits after the evidence is so adduced, it is not necessary to interfere in the Writ Jurisdiction.

¶19

The learned Civil Judge has also not concluded the issue and it is deferred at the time of hearing. The learned Civil Judge can pass appropriate order in respect of the electricity charges paid by the Petitioner during the pendency of the Suit, in case the learned Civil Judge comes to the conclusion that the Respondent – Developer was liable to pay the same. Keeping contentions of the parties open in that regard to be decided in the pending Suit, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶20

(N.M. Jamdar, J.)

Sai Heritage Co-Op. Housing Society Ltd. through Its Chairman Dr. Prashyant R. Dharmadhikari v. M/S. Saibaba Builders and Developers and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sai Heritage Co-Op. Housing Society Ltd. through Its Chairman Dr. Prashyant R. Dharmadhikari v. M/S. Saibaba Builders and Developers and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ispl Industries Ltd. Vs Remi Metals Gujarat Ltd.

Shri. Sanjay Dnyanoba Doke Vs Jalindar Bhagwan Doke and Ors.

Shri. Sanjay Dnyanoba Doke Vs Jalindar Bhagwan Doke and Ors.

Basavraj Biddappa Ajari Vs Kalpavruksha Earth Movers Escavation and Anr.

Mahadev Dagdu Mokashi and Ors. Vs Shri. Manik Mahadevv Mokashi

Shri. Vaibhav Sadashiv Patil Vs Shri. Balraj Rayaji Mane and Ors.