Maharashtra Wine Merchants Association through Authorized Signatory v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
1034-wp-13182-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1034 WRIT PETITION NO.13182 OF 2019
MAHARASHTRA WINE MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION THROUGH
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Vikram S. Undre, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. S. Patil, AGP for Respondents-State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 18th OCTOBER, 2019.
PER COURT:-
1.We have heard Mr. Undre, learned counsel
for the petitioner in the morning session. The
matter was kept back at the request of learned
A.G.P. to take instructions.
2.The learned A.G.P. upon instructions of
the Collector, Aurangabad submits that the
Collector, Aurangabad would modify the order dated
05.10.2019. The ban on sale of liquor would be
restricted up to the end of the Poll on 21.10.2019
and on 24.10.2019 till the end of counting.
3.In light of the above, the purpose of the
writ petition now does not survive.
(2)
1034-wp-13182-2019
4.Writ Petition accordingly disposed of. No
costs.
(MANGESH S. PATIL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
JUDGE JUDGE
Devendra/October-19
Maharashtra Wine Merchants Association through Authorized Signatory
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Mangesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court