Disposed

Shri. Kharade Rajendra Ajinath v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, School Education Dept and Ors.

Bombay HC7 Nov 2019WP/1294/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Multiple writ petitions challenging employment-related matters were disposed of as infructuous because the petitioners had since been absorbed into service, rendering the petitions unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions and interim applications were disposed of as infructuous due to the petitioners being absorbed.

Shri. Kharade Rajendra Ajinath Vs State of… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

909-1-WP-3305-14+.doc

¶2

Sharayu Khot.

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 3305 OF 2014

¶5

WITH

¶6

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1719 OF 2019

¶7

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 3305 OF 2014

¶9

Shri Digamber Pandurang Karche …Petitioner

¶10

Versus

¶11

State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents

¶12

WITH

¶13

WRIT PETITION NO. 612 OF 2010

¶14

WITH

¶15

REVIEW PETITION NO. 64 OF 2010

¶16

¶17

WRIT PETITION NO. 612 OF 2010

¶18

Shri Pramod Vishnu Sutar …Petitioner

¶19

Versus

¶20

State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents

¶21

WITH

¶22

WRIT PETITION NO. 613 OF 2010

¶23

WITH

¶24

REVIEW PETITION NO. 66 OF 2010

¶25

¶26

WRIT PETITION NO. 613 OF 2010

¶27

1/ 4 November 07, 2019

¶28

909-1-WP-3305-14+.doc Shri. Kishor Shivaji Kamble …Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10126 OF 2013 Shri Shahajahan Mahamd Hanif Patil & Anr. …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12 OF 2014 Shri Gaikwad Dattatraya Ganpat …Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1291 OF 2014 Shri Kadam Bhaskar Bhimdeo …Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1294 OF 2014 Shri Kharade Rajendra Ajinath …Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents

¶29

2/ 4

¶30

November 07, 2019

¶31

909-1-WP-3305-14+.doc

¶32

WITH

¶33

WRIT PETITION NO. 1295 OF 2014 Shri Mandlik Ramrao Bhausaheb …Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents

¶34

WITH

¶35

WRIT PETITION NO. 1815 OF 2014 Shri. Vijay Raygonda Lohar …Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents

¶36

WITH

¶37

WRIT PETITION NO. 1816 OF 2014

¶38

Shri. Popat Ananda Mane …Petitioner

¶39

Versus

¶40

State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents

¶41

Mr. Saurabh Pakale, a/w Dnyaneshar Kale, i/by Kiran Kumar Phakade, for the Petitioners in WPs/612/10, 613/10, 1815/14, 1816/14 and 7985/09 is not on board.

¶42

Mr. V.A. Madane, for the Petitioner in WPs/12/14, 1291/14, 1294/14, 1295/14.

¶43

Mr. Y.B. Lengare, for the Petitioners in WP/10126/13.

¶44

Mrs. R.A. Salunkhe, AGP, for the Respondent-State in all WPs.

¶45

Mr. Ranjeet H. Patil, Mr. Kiran Patil, i/by for the Respondents No. 5 & 6 in WP/613/10.

¶46

Mr. Milind Deshmukh, for the Respondent No. 5 in Wps/1294/14 and 1295/14.

¶47

3/ 4

¶48

November 07, 2019

¶49

909-1-WP-3305-14+.doc

¶50

Mr. M.N. Dhamal, for the Respondents No. 6 to 8 in WP/3305/14. Mr. Chandrashekhar Dhekane, Asstt. Director Pune present in Court.

¶51

CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I. CHAGLA JJ. DATE : 07 November 2019

¶52

ORDER :

¶53

These Petitioners have since been absorbed and their services are protected. In these circumstances, by virtue of the subsequent development, these Writ Petitions are rendered infructuous. These are disposed of as infructuous.

¶54

All the interim applications will not survive once the Writ Petitions are disposed of.

¶55

[R.I. CHAGLA J.] [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.]

¶56

4/ 4 November 07, 2019

Shri. Kharade Rajendra Ajinath v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, School Education Dept and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Kharade Rajendra Ajinath v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, School Education Dept and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishnamrutam Enterprises Private Limited Vs the Union of India and 7 Ors.

Maharashtra Purogami Prathamik Shikshak Sanghatana, through Shri. Prasad Hindurao Patil Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Education and Sports Dept

Mr. Hardas Hazarimal Tharwai Vs State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Ors.

Shri. Gavali Sunil Vishnu Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, School Education Dept and Ors.

Shri. Mandlik Ramrao Bhausaheb Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, School Education Dept and Ors.

Shri. Kadam Bhaskar Bhimdeo Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, School Education Dept and Ors.