Writ petition assigned date; petitioner and advocate absent on assignment date. Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-WP-1260-15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1260 OF 2015
Smt.Kalpana Mohanrao Shirgaonkar and Ors.
… Petitioners
Vs
The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.
… Respondents
Mr.S.R.Ganbavale for the Petitioners absent.
Mrs.A.A.Purav, AGP for State-Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for Respondent No.3.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S.PATEL, JJ.
DATE :- JULY 11, 2019
P.C. :-
they are absent. Following our earlier order, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(G.S.PATEL, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
M.M.Salgaonkar
Smt. Kalpana Mohanrao Shirgaonkar and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
