Disposed

Muslim Samajprabodhan Sanstha through Its President/Secretary v. Siddiqui Shabana Aazami

Bombay HC5 Dec 2019WP/12288/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged the respondent's reinstatement and subsequent termination. The court held the matter was sub judice due to pending proceedings on the termination, resulting in the petition being disposed of with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as nothing survives for consideration with no order as to costs.

Muslim Samajprabodhan Sanstha through Its… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

Pradnya Bhogale 1 934 wp 12288-18.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.12288 OF 2018

¶4

Muslim Samaj Prabodhan Sanstha … Petitioner
Vs.
Siddiqui Shabana Aazami… Respondent

¶5

None for the petitioner.

¶6

Mr. Irvin D’souza I/b. Sugandh B. Deshmukh for the respondent.

¶7

P. C.:

¶8

1.None for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the

¶9

respondent.

¶10

2.Learned counsel for the respondent states that the
respondent pursuant to the impugned order was reinstated.
However, after sometime his services again came to be terminated.

¶11

3.In this view of the matter, as the petitioner was already
reinstated, nothing remains for consideration in this petition.

¶12

4.Learned counsel for the respondent has stated that
proceedings have been already filed against the subsequent
termination. Those proceedings obviously will be decided on its
own merits and in accordance with law.

¶13

1 of 2

¶14

Pradnya Bhogale 2 934 wp 12288-18.doc

¶15

5.The petition is disposed of as nothing survives for

¶16

consideration with no order as to costs.

¶17

 ( M. S. KARNIK, J. )

¶18

2 of 2

Muslim Samajprabodhan Sanstha through Its President/Secretary v. Siddiqui Shabana Aazami

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muslim Samajprabodhan Sanstha through Its President/Secretary v. Siddiqui Shabana Aazami

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tatwajnana Vidyapeeth and 3 Ors. Vs Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/Income-Tax Officer and 3 Ors.

Zuari Industries Ltd. Vs the Commissionher of Income Tax,Central-I, Mumbai.

Zuari Industriess Ltd. Vs the Commissioner of Income Tax,Central-I. Mumbai.