The High Court of Bombay disposed of a writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioners after expressing disinclination to grant relief in writ jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
911-WP.11343.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11343 OF 2019
Pramila Dashrath Shiraskar } and Ors. } Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra } and Ors. } Respondents
Mr.A.R.Kapadnis for the petitioners.
Mr.B.V.Samant-AGP for State.
Mr.R.S.Apte-Senior Advocate I/b. Mr.N.R.Bubna for respondent no.2.
Mr.Manoj B. Bagal I/b. Mr.Ajit M. Savagave for respondent no.3.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & R. I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATED :- DECEMBER 18, 2019
P.C. :-
also the affidavit in reply, we were disinclined to grant any relief in writ jurisdiction. On such a disinclination being expressed in open court, on instructions from the petitioners who are present in court, Mr.Kapadnis seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
Page 1 of 2
J.V.SALUNKE,PS
911-WP.11343.2019.doc
Page 2 of 2
J.V.SALUNKE,PS
Pramila Dashrath Shiraskar
State of Maharashtra
S. C. Dharmadhikari
R. I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
