Petitioners filed a writ petition regarding a pending objection under the National Highways Act. The bench dismissed the petition, directing the Competent Authority to resolve the underlying objection first and keeping merits open.
Writ petition disposed of; parties' contentions on merits kept open; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
902 WRIT PETITION NO.10860 OF 2019
SULBHA RAMCHANDRA KADAM AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr Patne Santosh N.
Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. R. R. Bangar
ORDER :
The objection filed by the petitioner under section 3(h)(4) of the National Highways Act is still pending. As the objection is still pending, it will not be appropriate to entertain the petition on merits.Learned Advocate for the respondent CompetentAuthority submits that the Competent Authority will
decide the objection on its own merits. In view of that,
the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
All contentions of the parties on merits are keptopen.
(ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
JPC
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be entertained on merits given that the petitioners' objection under the National Highways Act is pending.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SULBHA RAMCHANDRA KADAM AND ANOTHER
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
ANIL S. KILOR
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court