Shantabai Dhondiram Narwade v. the State of Maharashtra through District Collector, Aurangabad and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner informed counsel that the matter became infructuous. The Writ Petition was disposed of accordingly.
Petitioner informed counsel that the matter became infructuous. The Writ Petition was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11-wp.10809-18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.10809 OF 2018
SHANTABAI DHONDIRAM NARWADE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA,
THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
Mr. R.K.Jadhavar, Advocate for petitioner Mr. A.B.Chate, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2
CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J. DATE : OCTOBER 15, 2019
PER COURT :-
Learned Counsel for the petitioner informs
that the matter has become infructuous. In view of the
statement, Writ Petition stands disposed of
kbp
Shantabai Dhondiram Narwade
The State of Maharashtra
R.G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court