This court disposed of a writ petition seeking approval for the petitioner's appointment. The bench directed the Education Officer to report for duty, refrain from unnecessary leave, and dispose of pending proposals within four weeks, accepting an undertaking from the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-WP-10791.2018.doc
suresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10791 OF 2018
Dinesh Dnyandev Bandgar .... Petitioner Vs. The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Solapur & Others .... Respondents
Mr. Ashok B. Tajane for the Petitioner. Mr. M.M. Pable, AGP, for the Respondent-State. Smt. Sudha Salunke, Deputy Education Officer (Secondary), Solapur, present.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 11, 2019
P.C:
Page 1 of 2
2-WP-10791.2018.doc
suresh
to the petitioner’s appointment.
(R.I. CHAGLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Education Officer should be directed to dispose of pending approval proposals within a specific timeframe.
Dinesh Dnyandev Bandgar
The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Solapur
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
R.I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
